God chose a certain method to spread the Gospel message: Tell people, and then those people will tell other people, and so on. We humans could easily conclude that this method is cruel and inefficient by looking at human history. Jesus Himself was crucified for spreading the message this way. St. Stephen, St. Paul, and all the Apostles except for St. John are thought to have suffered violent deaths for spreading the Gospel message. We can see that this method is inefficient because 2,000 years later there are still people in the world who have not heard about Jesus. Some people have heard the message so poorly communicated that thay are not inclined to accept it. Yet we do not deny that God chose to use this method to spread the Good News of salvation through Jesus Christ. Neither can we conclude that God did not use evolution because to us it seems cruel and inefficient.
St. Paul gives a long warning against criticizing the ways of God in Romans 9: 9-24. He gives examples from Biblical history, then denies our right to conclude that God was unfair or unkind. Note especially verse 20: "No, don't say that. Who are you to criticize God? Should the thing made say to the one who made it, 'Why have you made me like this?'"
Today, humanity dominates Earth and is not only depleting its primary energy resources at prodigious rates, but it is also that rivals the . Humans may cause Earth’s greatest mass extinction, which may take humanity with it. Today, , and almost nobody seems to know or care. Humanity is a tunnel-visioned, egocentric species, and almost all people are only concerned about their immediate self-interest and are oblivious of what lies ahead. Not all humans are so blind, and and , among others intimately familiar with the impacts of global civilization, are terrified by what humanity is inflicting onto Earth. Also, those who realize that we are quickly coming to the Hydrocarbon Age’s end are and I cannot blame them. We are in a “” scenario, and several manmade trends threaten our future existence.
I like the faith message that I get out of the "literary device" viewpoint. My only minor quibble is that the order of Genesis 1 is close enough to the natural scientific order. I believe that the general order of creation in Genesis 1 can be scientific as well as symbolic.
Essays Articles Science Service Man
Research can be performed using a variety of methodological approaches “including: surveys and questionnaires, interviews, randomized clinical trials, direct observation, physiological manipulations and recording, descriptive methods, laboratory and field experiments, standardized tests, economic analyses, statistical modeling, ethnography, and evaluation” (Behavioral and Social Sciences (BSSR) Definition, 2010)....
Essay Science In The Service Of Man
The rise of life was based on . Just as the remained basically unchanged since the Cambrian Explosion, energy systems form the foundations for all ecosystems and civilizations. While the superstructure change and can seem radical at times, the foundation dictates what kind of superstructure exist. A huge superstructure built on a small foundation, if it can be built at all, will not be very resilient (the first earthquake or storm levels it), and will not last long. Today, industrialized civilization is burning through its foundational energy sources a million times as fast as they were created and will largely . On the , the rise and fall of humanity may happen in the blink of an eye and create more ecosystem devastation than the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs; it would happen faster than all previous mass extinctions other than that asteroid’s effect. Arthropods may then come to rule the world once again.
Essay Science In Service Of Man
Also, just as no fundamentally new body plans appeared after the Cambrian Explosion, modern ecosystems seem constrained by body size. Body sizes have similar “slots,” and body sizes outside of those slots are relatively rare. However, successful innovation usually happens at the fringes. The fringes are where survival is marginal and innovations carry a high risk/reward ratio. Most innovations fail, but a successful one can become universally dominant, such as those biological innovations that are considered to have happened only . There have been countless failed biological innovations during life’s history on Earth, many of which might have seemed brilliant but did not survive the rigors of living.